Todd, everything I do is calculated and so the answer is yes it is calculated and the reason I am posting multiple times a day and I think you are referring to clearly Twitter is the before mentioned answer in the Instagram question, questions ago, which is Twitter has gotten noisy. I have looked at data and intuition, looked inside myself and decided that it is okay for me to do it multiple times because the speed is happening, the hardcore fans will accept that it is okay I have seen that and just so many call it 90% of people that want to consume my content. I've shared I will make the Twitter mistake on the deck, you know, I put out today and people like oh, and like it is you know there is just so much noise that I feel the market has changed and I think it is appropriate almost like a scrolling bar at the bottom of ESPN, right? If you think about that, that is looping the same stuff and it does not bother me. I can choose to look at the bottom or not and weirdly and I am sure all of you do this. Sometime you just look again and again and again. It is kind of wild that way. I think that Twitter's fire hose now replicates the bottom ticker of CNBC and ESPN and I think it is the right execution to put out your stuff at different times, different time zones. I want to hit my European and Asian and non-US family, what's up, non US. I want to hit my West Coast peeps. You know, you are going to play it differently and that is just the way it is and I think it is appropriate in December 16, 2014, world to put out the same content multiple times on the Twitter, I like calling it on the Twitter, in a world where in December 16, 2008, I felt differently. I changed my mind consistently, which is why I think I win and honestly, which is why I think I am worth the attention that you are applying to this show and why I think this format works because the game is changing quickly and often and if you are not adjusting, you are going to lose, you know, the 85 Bears one on a system that does not work in today's NFL. Heck, heck, you know 2000 who won last year, the Seahawks. The Seahawks are not even able to execute the same game plan as last year of the NFL because the way the officials call and something of that nature and so you just got to keep evolving and if you do not, you lose and that is the evolution of my game, so advice that I gave in Jab, Jab, Jab, Right Hook would have looked differently today about Twitter because between time I wrote it and this minute the game is changed.
Gary Vaynerchuk is a New York Times and Wall Street Journal Best-Selling author, self-taught wine expert, and innovative entrepreneur. Find more at http://garyvaynerchuk.com
Jab, Jab, Jab, Right Hook is now available on Amazon! http://bit.ly/jjjrhamazon instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook
Gary Vaynerchuk is a New York Times and Wall Street Journal Best-Selling author, self-taught wine expert, and innovative entrepreneur. Find more at http://garyvaynerchuk.com
Jab, Jab, Jab, Right Hook is now available on Amazon! http://bit.ly/jjjrhamazon instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram instagram facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook facebook
<3
just 10 comments😮
Anyone watching in 2018 ? Just finding out about Gary and loving it
i'll take bloviate for 1000, alex.
Looking at the analytics on my individual tweets and exposure rate vs followers, most tweets only seem to hit 25% of followers (at least for me anyways, unless RT of course) so yeah, no issues with repeats, especially at different times of day. Good advice as always!
Guy Kawasaki has pretty much the exact same answer for this, makes perfect sense!
Besides, what's wrong with being simultaneously calculated and obnoxious if it gets you results? 😀
I don't mind the constant waterfall of content.
whats up Gary- all the way from Oz 😉
Interesting view. Love the comparison to the ticker. 100% agree to cut through the noise- doubling up may be prudent. Cheers
Some solid advice. One might say that "obnoxious" is OK! 🙂
Super liberating to hear this. Very practical advice when you consider how quickly the Twitter feed moves. 🙂